Fictional worked example

Two estate records. One receipt counted once.

A bank confirmation and an executor statement describe the same cash receipt. This example shows how the evidence organizer connects the records, avoids counting the money twice, and keeps unanswered valuation and reporting questions visible.

All names, records, dates, amounts, and confirmations here are fictional. The organizer supports an accepted Foreign Gift or Inheritance U.S. Filing Plan engagement. The evidence agent checks the facts and approves personalized conclusions.

The records describe the same event

In this scenario, the fictional recipient confirms a direct cash bequest from the Fictional Estate of Rowan Vale in 2025. The two records expressly confirm the same receipt. Their matching amount and date alone would require a follow-up question; the example includes an explicit duplicate confirmation.

Fictional source records and their receipt evidence
Source and pageReceipt dateOriginal amountHow it is used
bank_confirmation_synthetic.pdf, page 12025-08-12125,000 USDReceipt record
executor_statement_synthetic.pdf, page 12025-08-12125,000 USDCorroborates the same receipt

The receipt ledger keeps both sources

The duplicate confirmation stays in the evidence trail. It contributes no additional receipt to the total. The scenario uses USD, so the original and USD amounts are the same.

Reconciled fictional receipt ledger
Ledger recordUSD amountTreatment in the totalEvidence
receipt_bank$125,000.00Counted oncebank_confirmation_synthetic.pdf, page 1; executor_statement_synthetic.pdf, page 1
receipt_executor$125,000.00Duplicate confirmationexecutor_statement_synthetic.pdf, page 1
Receipt total$125,000.00One receipt, supported by both fictional records above

Client confirmation and reviewer support are simulated fixture states here. No actual client or reviewer signed off on this fictional case.

Receipt value answers one question

The supported receipt amount does not fill in the other value fields. These questions need their own records and review; the organizer keeps each unknown empty with a reason.

Separate unresolved value questions
Value questionStatusReason
Date-of-death valueUnknownNo reviewed date-of-death value is supplied in this synthetic cash receipt scenario.
Inherited basisUnknownThe organizer does not infer inherited basis from receipt value; basis has not been separately reviewed.
Later sale proceedsUnknownNo later sale proceeds are established by this synthetic receipt evidence.

What Chip still reviews

  • Recipient and source status, the estate classification, and the nature of the distribution.
  • Other receipts, related sources, intermediaries, recipient allocation, and any income included in the payment.
  • The applicable tax-year rules, deadlines, and any information needed for a separately scoped filing.

This example illustrates factual reconciliation. It does not decide whether you must file Form 3520, establish inherited basis, or resolve a trust, covered-expatriate, valuation, penalty, or late-filing question. Those conclusions require the accepted facts and Chip's review.

Reference record

Rule version 2026-10-10.1; source checked 2026-10-10. IRS Form 3520 instructions (Instructions revised December 2025; continuous use for tax year 2025 and later until superseded). Form 3520 (Rev. December 2023). The source check records the reference used; it is separate from qualified review or approval of a personalized conclusion.

Foreign Inheritance Evidence: A Fictional Worked Example | FileAbroad